Despite lockdown, sexually transmitted diseases continue to skyrocket

Home / Despite lockdown, sexually transmitted diseases continue to skyrocket

Image

In the first year of COVID, STDs still somehow increased across the US. What’s behind it?

Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) continue to rise. But according to last week’s press release from the CDC, it’s apparently got nothing to do with sex.

Unless you’re a county health officer, you probably missed it, but last week was STD Awareness Week. In a press release issued April 12, 2022, the CDC reported that sexually transmitted diseases in 2020 (the most current completed data) managed to surpass 2019 levels in spite of pandemic lockdowns. An early dip at the beginning of 2020 was more than offset by a rebound in the latter part of the year. In this CDC chart, areas below the line represent a decrease over 2019, while areas above the line (shaded in blue) represent an increase. (They suspect the drop in chlamydia was due to decreased screening).

Chart

Description automatically generated

The report further noted that congenital syphilis tripled between 2016 and 2020:

Syphilis in newborns more than tripled from 2016 – 2020, from 641 reported cases in 2016 to 2,148 reported cases in 2020.

Who are most affected?

The highest infection rates were among young people, gay and bisexual men, and some racial minorities. Yet somehow, amazingly, in its press release, the CDC failed to apprehend any connection between STDs and sexual behavior, instead blaming them on “lack of access to regular medical care, discrimination, and stigma.”

“The COVID-19 pandemic increased awareness of a reality we’ve long known about STDs. Social and economic factors – such as poverty and health insurance status – create barriers, increase health risks, and often result in worse health outcomes for some people,” said Leandro Mena, M.D., M.P.H., Director of CDC’s Division of STD Prevention. “If we are to make lasting progress against STDs in this country, we have to understand the systems that create inequities and work with partners to change them. No one can be left behind.”

Not one word about the types of activity that might actually transmit such a thing as a sexually transmitted disease. But while the latest report focused on the rise in syphilis and gonorrhea, their prevalence, as opposed to incidence, is eclipsed by HPV, HSV-2, trichomoniasis, and HIV.

A picture containing text

Description automatically generated

As to which demographic groups are most at risk, men who have sex with men (MSM) figure most prominently. In this CDC chart of historical data, MSM are disproportionately represented among syphilis cases, while most of the increase over the last five years has emerged among heterosexual men and women:

Chart

Description automatically generated

It is essential to understand that while the overlap is considerable, MSM is not equivalent to the social category of “homosexual .” According to Twenge et al. (2016), the number of men reporting exclusively same-sex experience is a mere 1.7%, while the percentage reporting any same-sex experience rose to 8.2% for males and 8.7% for females. The large gap between exclusive same-sex experience and any same-sex experience is comprised of bisexuals, homosexuals with some opposite-sex experience, heterosexuals with some same-sex experience, youthful experimentation, or sexual malleability. The data is murky, and almost all of it is based on self-reporting – since there is no objective test for determining another’s sexual orientation.

With that very large caveat, the problem appears muchf greater among self-identified homosexual men. A very recent (2021) report published in the BMJ on nationwide surveillance data from New Zealand concluded that relative to heterosexual men, gay and bisexual men faced:

  • A 348-fold increased risk of HIV
  • A 163-fold increased risk of syphilis
  • A 57-fold increased risk of gonorrhea

Why are they most affected?

It had been recognized for decades that male homosexuals were at increased risk of STDs, explained by increased promiscuity and the inherent danger of anogenital intercourse. However, the prevailing cultural narrative regards these as unjustified and harmful stereotypes. The data says otherwise. In the Relationships in America Survey (2014) from the Austin Institute for the Study of Family and Culture (UT Austin), 45% of gay men report more than 20 lifetime partners, versus 11% of heterosexual men. At the lower end of the range, only 34% of gay men report less than 10 lifetime partners, versus 74% of heterosexual men.

This does not prove that gay men are inherently more libidinous than heterosexual men. Indeed, the difference would be predicted by theories of sexual economics. While in heterosexual encounters females act as gatekeepers, in male-to-male relationships the gatekeeper effect is eliminated. Social and cultural forces within gay communities almost certainly play a role. Levels of gay promiscuity clearly dropped in the early years of the AIDS epidemic, when the diagnosis often meant a death sentence. With the advent of more effective treatment, promiscuity among MSM (of whom over 80% identify as homosexual) is again on the rise, with a notable increase over the time period of 2008-2014 per CDC surveillance data (reported by Chapin-Bardales et al. in 2019). In the same report, the total partner count among MSM was nearly 8 per year, and condom use was declining, not improving.

It has been further established that transmission of STDs is far, far more likely via anorectal intercourse than vaginal intercourse. The physiologic reasons making it inherently dangerous include 1) the rectum has a much thinner wall, 2) the rectum is relatively inelastic and more vulnerable to trauma, 3) the rectum lacks the same immune defenses, 4) the rectum terminates in a sphincter which is necessary for proper function but an impediment to misuse, and 5) the rectum is colonized with many more bacterial pathogens.

So, to reduce STDs dramatically, the obvious medical advice would be to limit the number of lifetime sexual partners (ideally, one) and abstain from anal intercourse. To its credit, the CDC in fact recommends that MSM minimize the number of lifetime partners. But nary a word regarding the other, other than the dully predictable “use a condom” – as if a thin membrane of latex could magically offset the danger.

Biblical sexuality promotes health

Considering the CDC’s dire warnings against cookie dough and rare or medium steaks, one would think they’d be all over something as inherently dangerous as anal intercourse. They certainly are aware of the risk – they simply avoid what might be a politically incorrect recommendation. While anal intercourse is strongly connected with male homosexuality (and not unfairly), it is by no means limited to that population. Many surveys show a disturbingly high percentage of heterosexuals also engage in the practice. It’s dangerous, no matter who is doing it, and our public health officials do a great disservice in not denouncing the practice outright.

Throughout the COVID pandemic, the CDC was viewed by some as the paragon of scientific objectivity and by others as deceptive and irredeemably political. Neither is realistic. It is both a scientific institution and a government bureaucracy, and often those two missions conflict. I view the CDC the same way I hope most of my colleagues do: a worthy institution comprised of many dedicated physicians and scientists doing their best to serve the public – but not immune from political meddling or ideological bias.

Once again, the overwhelming preponderance of evidence is that the Biblical paradigm of human sexuality – lifelong heterosexual monogamy – is the surest pathway to human health and flourishing. But even within that framework, certain sexual practices are unequivocally off-limits.

About Author

about author

Steven Willing MD, MBA

Dr. Steven Willing received his medical degree from the Medical College of Georgia, completed an internship in pediatrics from the University of Virginia before undertaking a residency in diagnostic radiology at the Medical College of Georgia, and a fellowship in neuroradiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Dr. Willing spent 20 years in academic medicine at the University of Louisville, the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He also earned an MBA from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 1997.

During his academic career, Dr. Willing published over 50 papers in the areas of radiology, informatics, and management. He is the author of "Atlas of Neuroradiology", published by W. B. Saunders in 1995.

Now retired from clinical practice, Dr. Willing serves as a radiology consultant to Tenwek Hospital in Bomet, Kenya both remotely and on-site. He is presently the Alabama State Director for the American Academy for Medical Ethics, an adjunct Professor of Divinity at Regent University, and a Visiting Scholar for Reasons to Believe.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: